Ordering the parties to cease and desist from committing the same or similar acts complained of; 3. On November 13, , MOLE issued an Order stating, among others, that the casual workers not performing janitorial and yard maintenance services had attained regular status on even date. Thus, Kimberly was held not guilty of an unfair labor practice, precluding the application of the in pari delicto doctrine. However, the Court has also stressed that the rules on forum shopping, which were designed to promote and facilitate the orderly administration of justice, should not be interpreted with such absolute literalness as to subvert its own ultimate and legitimate objective. With the denial of its motion for reconsideration, 40 Kimberly elevated the case before this Court, on the following grounds:. 
| Uploader: | Meztilar |
| Date Added: | 20 August 2016 |
| File Size: | 14.63 Mb |
| Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
| Downloads: | 96978 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
On account of the May 17, strike, Kimberly filed on June qlindog, a complaint to declare the strike illegal. However, the DOLE ordered the payment of the differential wages and other benefits of the regularized workers, to wit:.
The NLRC disposed of the case as follows: Again, the rules of procedure shall be liberally construed in order to promote their objective of securing a just, speedy and inexpensive disposition of every action and proceeding. The order of consolidation was later recalled on June 27, because of the order of dismissal already issued in CA-G.
Alindog () - Qaptured
Hence, the instant petition for review on certiorari G. Ordering Kimberly Clark Phil. Thus, Kimberly was held not guilty of an unfair labor practice, precluding the application of the in pari delicto doctrine. With regard to the certification against forum shopping, suffice it to state that in Cavile alincog.
Both parties filed their respective motions for reconsideration, which were denied by the NLRC. We find as sufficient in form alinddog disputed verification and certification against forum shopping.
However, the Court has also stressed that the rules on forum shopping, which were designed to promote and alndog the orderly administration of justice, should not be interpreted with such absolute literalness as to subvert its own ultimate and legitimate objective.
In fact, the petitioners prayed for a remand of their case to the CA which was the proper court to resolve said issue.
Oh no, there's been an error
Court of Appeals, G. However, after receipt of the petition for review and the other records of the case, the Court ascertained that the resolutions being questioned were only those rendered in CA-G. Pursuant to Article VIII, Section 13 of the Constitution, and the Division Chairperson's Attestation, it is hereby certified that the conclusions in the above resolution were reached in consultation before the case slindog assigned to the writer of the opinion of the Court.
The rule of substantial compliance may be availed of with respect to the contents of the certification.
This is because the requirement of strict compliance with the provisions regarding the certification of non-forum shopping merely underscores its mandatory nature in that the certification cannot be altogether dispensed with or its requirements completely disregarded. In the instant case, despite the fact that Ernesto Facundo, the union president, was not shown to have been duly authorized to sign the aindog on behalf of the other petitioners, the CA should not have been too strict in the application of the Rules.
The rule is that the certificate of non-forum shopping must be signed by all the petitioners or plaintiffs in a case and the signing by only one of them is insufficient. We find that the execution by Thomas George Cavile, Sr.
Ramos resolved the case in this wise: This principle finds greater application in labor cases where social justice should be emphasized. Moreover, it has been held that the merits of the substantive aspects of the case may be deemed as "special circumstance" for the Court to take cognizance of a petition for review although the certification against forum shopping was executed and signed by only one of the petitioners.
Watch Super Hit Full Movies: [Access] Alindog () Full Movie HD
On the recommendation 41 of the Division Clerk of Court and in the interest of an orderly administration of justice, the Court, on May 24,ordered the consolidation of this case, G. They also share a common defense in the complaint for partition filed by the respondents. Heirs of Cavile, 46 we took cognizance of alindg petition although its certification was executed and signed by only one of several petitioners, thus: All other claims are hereby dismissed for lack of merit.
The NLRC disposed of the case as follows:. Kimberly contends in the main that only those employees who were parties in G. As the consolidated cases do not involve a common question of law, 43 the Court resolves to de-consolidate them. Ordering the parties to cease and desist from committing the same or similar acts complained of.
Full Cast & Crew
We have emphasized, time and again, that verification is a formal, not a jurisdictional requisite, as it is mainly intended to secure an assurance that the allegations therein made are done in good faith or are true and correct and not mere speculation. On the legibility of the attached pleadings, particularly the complaint and the amended a,indog, we find that the same may be excused given the antiquity of the said documents.
Litigants should have the amplest opportunity for a proper and just disposition of their cause — free, as much as possible, from the constraints of procedural technicalities. Due to the elevation of CA-G. Nevertheless, a perusal of the records reveals that the said pleadings are legible enough.
Comments
Post a Comment